BidEligible

City of Providence · Providence, RI

Item Description: Request for Qualifications - Water Treatment Filter Inspection & Maintenance Services for Providence Water (2026-2032) Procurement/MinuteTraq #: 54333

1 source documentsSource checked Sep 18Content updated
Open notice
Response deadline
Not confirmed
Confirm the deadline with the buyer.
Published project value
Not confirmed
Check the pricing and payment terms below.
Solicitation number
Not confirmed
Document coverage
1 / 1documents readAll discovered documents read

1 document found65% of weighted requirement checks reviewed

Before you bid

Review first

Start with these requirements and unresolved points.
  • Must do
    Joint ventures & teaming
    View 1 flagged requirement
    1. Requirement 1 ↗

      In case of joint ventures or partnerships of firms, the "Prime" Proposer must meet the criteria established in the QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSERS and this Section.

01

Eligibility & participation

Whether you can bid at all, and what you must already hold.

5 verified1 to confirm

Experience & references

Needs confirmation

—

Needs confirmation

View source 1
01page 12View official source ↗
“Qualified firms must have a minimum of 10 years of demonstrative corporate experience and provide a statement of qualifications including the following: A brief history and description of the firm submitting the proposal. o Verification of active registration to conduct business in the State of Rhode Island. o Client r”

Key personnel

4 findings
Requirement 1Verified
• The following table indicates the relative significance of each criteria to be used in determining the successful proposer: Evaluation Criteria Distribution 1. Staff/Firm’s Significant Relevant Experience and Performance 30% 2. Experience & Qualifications of Key Personnel 30% 3Read full requirement Close full requirement

• The following table indicates the relative significance of each criteria to be used in determining the successful proposer: Evaluation Criteria Distribution 1. Staff/Firm’s Significant Relevant Experience and Performance 30% 2. Experience & Qualifications of Key Personnel 30% 3

Applies to: person

View source 1
01page 19View official source ↗
“• The following table indicates the relative significance of each criteria to be used in determining the successful proposer: Evaluation Criteria Distribution 1. Staff/Firm’s Significant Relevant Experience and Performance 30% 2. Experience & Qualifications of Key Personnel 30% 3.Safety, Compliance,”
Requirement 2Verified

• Past Experience and Performance This factor considers the number and complexity of comparable projects associated o with the Proposer’s key personnel.

Applies to: person

View source 1
01page 20View official source ↗
“• Past Experience and Performance This factor considers the number and complexity of comparable projects associated o with the Proposer’s key personnel.”
Requirement 3Verified

• Key Personnel/ Team Members Proposer must identify key personnel, team members, and staff members and their o specific expertise and experience in construction and project management.

Applies to: person

View source 1
01page 20View official source ↗
“• Key Personnel/ Team Members Proposer must identify key personnel, team members, and staff members and their o specific expertise and experience in construction and project management.”
Requirement 4Verified

Provide resumes of key personnel who will be the designated team.

Applies to: person

View source 1
01page 20View official source ↗
“Provide resumes of key personnel who will be the designated team.”

Joint ventures & teaming

Verified

In case of joint ventures or partnerships of firms, the "Prime" Proposer must meet the criteria established in the QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSERS and this Section.

View source 1
01page 13View official source ↗
“In case of joint ventures or partnerships of firms, the "Prime" Proposer must meet the criteria established in the QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSERS and this Section.”
Missing information4 checks · expand to review

A missing value is not a waiver. Check the source or ask the agency before relying on it.

Registrations

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Set-aside

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Small business size

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Required licenses

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

4 additional fields have no reviewed finding.

02

Deadlines & submission

When and how to submit, and whether you are still in time.

3 verified3 to confirm

How to submit

2 findings
Requirement 1Verified

Responses may be submitted up to 2:15 P.M. on the above meeting date at the Department of the City Clerk.

View source 1
01page 2View official source ↗
“Responses may be submitted up to 2:15 P.M. on the above meeting date at the Department of the City Clerk.”
Requirement 2Verified

5. Responses may be submitted on an “equal in quality” basis. The City reserves the right to decide equality.

View source 1
01page 4View official source ↗
“5. Responses may be submitted on an “equal in quality” basis. The City reserves the right to decide equality.”

Procurement contact

2 findings
Requirement 1Needs confirmation

—

Needs confirmation

View source 1
01page 9View official source ↗
“Point of Contact: Telephone: Email:”
Requirement 2Needs confirmation

—

Needs confirmation

View source 1
01page 18View official source ↗
“The letter shall indicate the principal or officer of the firm who will be Providence Water’s primary point of contact for administering the Contract and coordinating potential work with Providence Water’s Project Administrator.”

Bid opening

Needs confirmation

—

Needs confirmation

View source 1
01page 2View official source ↗
“At 2:15 P.M. all bids will be publicly opened and read at the Board of Contract Meeting in Conference Room 305, on the 3rd floor of City Hall.”

Formatting & signatures

Verified

Any exceptions or modifications must be noted and fully explained. 2. Responder’s submissions must be in ink or typewritten, and all blanks on the form should be completed. 3. All responses MUST BE SIGNED IN INK.

View source 1
01page 5View official source ↗
“Any exceptions or modifications must be noted and fully explained. 2. Responder’s submissions must be in ink or typewritten, and all blanks on the form should be completed. 3. All responses MUST BE SIGNED IN INK.”
Missing information5 checks · expand to review

A missing value is not a waiver. Check the source or ask the agency before relying on it.

Response deadline

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Questions due

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Site visit / pre-bid meeting

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Required submission files

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Acknowledge amendments

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

5 additional fields have no reviewed finding.

Continue your review

6 more sections are available once you sign in

Pricing & payment · Bonds & insurance · Evaluation & award · Scope & delivery · Labor, sourcing & compliance · Contract terms & risk

Sign in — free

Extracted from the public documents linked above. This is an information aid, not a determination of bid eligibility or legal advice. Verify the original wording and any addenda before submitting a bid.

Bid review
Closing date not confirmed
See all 10