BidEligible

AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF · Lava Hot Springs, ID

Big Springs Horse Corral Replacement

9 source documentsSource checked Oct 21Content updated
Open notice
Response deadline
6 days left
Published project value
Not confirmed
Check the pricing and payment terms below.
Solicitation number
1240LT26Q0179
View official posting ↗Review requirements ↓Original posting details are available below.

Dates to plan around

Times follow the original source.

  1. Response deadline
    Source wording
    2026-10-29T17:00:00-06:00
From the posting1 agency details · contact information and original wording
Status
closed
Worth confirming on the posting
View the official posting →Always the authority. An addendum can change any of this after we read it.
Document coverage
7 / 9documents readReview incomplete

9 documents found1 partially read1 need OCR19% of weighted requirement checks reviewed

Newer source changes have not been verified. Confirm the latest notice and addenda before submitting.

Before you bid

Review first

Start with these requirements and unresolved points.
01

Eligibility & participation

Whether you can bid at all, and what you must already hold.

5 verified

Registrations

2 findings
Requirement 1Verified

licensing, registration, permitting, or other eligibility requirements that must be in place prior to submitting a quotation, beyond an active SAM registration and the

Applies when: prior to submitting a quotation, beyond an active SAM registration and theMust be met by: prior to submitting a quotation, beyond an active SAM registration and the

View source 1
01page 3View official source ↗
“licensing, registration, permitting, or other eligibility requirements that must be in place prior to submitting a quotation, beyond an active SAM registration and the”
Source page 3

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 3
Missing information · 1 check
Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Set-aside

3 findings
Requirement 1Verified

SBA

View source 1
01https://sam.gov/api/prod/opps/v2/opportunities/89d8b2952edd4d82ba195fb9bdb9d4df /data2/solicitation/setAsideView official source ↗
“SBA”
Missing information · 2 checks
Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Key personnel

Verified
Wage rates should be for Caribou County Idaho as listed in the solicitation. 15. May a proposed subcontractor's comparable concrete/earthwork projects and key personnel satisfy the technical experience requirement, with their role clearly identified in our quotation? See answer tRead full requirement Close full requirement

Wage rates should be for Caribou County Idaho as listed in the solicitation. 15. May a proposed subcontractor's comparable concrete/earthwork projects and key personnel satisfy the technical experience requirement, with their role clearly identified in our quotation? See answer t

Applies to: subcontractor

View source 1
01page 4View official source ↗
“Wage rates should be for Caribou County Idaho as listed in the solicitation. 15. May a proposed subcontractor's comparable concrete/earthwork projects and key personnel satisfy the technical experience requirement, with their role clearly identified in our quotation? See answer to question 11 16. Pa”
Source page 4

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 4

Joint ventures & teaming

2 findings
Requirement 1Verified
11. For the experience requirements identified in Attachment C04d, may an offeror rely on the relevant experience of a proposed major subcontractor, similarly situated subcontractor, or joint venture member to demonstrate experience in general construction, concrete work, and earRead full requirement Close full requirement

11. For the experience requirements identified in Attachment C04d, may an offeror rely on the relevant experience of a proposed major subcontractor, similarly situated subcontractor, or joint venture member to demonstrate experience in general construction, concrete work, and ear

Applies when: if there is a replaceme

Applies to: subcontractor

View source 1
01page 4View official source ↗
“11. For the experience requirements identified in Attachment C04d, may an offeror rely on the relevant experience of a proposed major subcontractor, similarly situated subcontractor, or joint venture member to demonstrate experience in general construction, concrete work, and earthwork? Yes, but if ”
Source page 4

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 4
Requirement 2Verified

12. If subcontractor or joint venture experience may be considered, how should that

Applies when: If subcontractor or joint venture experience may be considered, how should that

Applies to: subcontractor

View source 1
01page 4View official source ↗
“12. If subcontractor or joint venture experience may be considered, how should that”
Source page 4

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 4
Missing information6 checks · expand to review

A missing value is not a waiver. Check the source or ask the agency before relying on it.

Small business size

2 findings
Requirement 1Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Requirement 2Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Required licenses

2 findings
Requirement 1Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Requirement 2Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Experience & references

2 findings
Requirement 1Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Requirement 2Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

4 additional fields have no reviewed finding.

02

Deadlines & submission

When and how to submit, and whether you are still in time.

5 verified1 to confirm

Response deadline

3 findings
Requirement 1Verified

2026-10-29T17:00:00-06:00

View source 1
01https://sam.gov/api/prod/opps/v2/opportunities/89d8b2952edd4d82ba195fb9bdb9d4df /data2/solicitation/deadlines/responseView official source ↗
“2026-10-29T17:00:00-06:00”
Missing information · 2 checks
Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Site visit / pre-bid meeting

3 findings
Requirement 1Verified

required

View source 1
01page 3View official source ↗
“5. Pre-Bid / Site Visit Requirement: Is there a mandatory pre-bid meeting, site visit, or site inspection that a contractor must attend in order to remain eligible to submit a quotation? Page 23 in solicitation, mandatory is not stated. 6. Any Additional Eligibility Requirements: Are there any state or local contractor”
Source page 3

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 3
Missing information · 2 checks
Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Procurement contact

2 findings
Requirement 1Verified

Terri Tucker · terri.tucker@usda.gov

View source 1
01https://sam.gov/api/prod/opps/v2/opportunities/89d8b2952edd4d82ba195fb9bdb9d4df /data2/pointOfContact/0View official source ↗
“Terri Tucker · terri.tucker@usda.gov”
Requirement 2Needs confirmation

—

Needs confirmation

View source 1
01page 50View official source ↗
“Contracting Officer:”
Source page 50

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 50

Mandatory forms

2 findings
Requirement 1Verified

Answer on Page 1 of SF1442. 22. What dates will water be on site through the water spicket, if there is running water it would make things much easier would take away the need to haul water.

Applies when: if there is running water it would make things much easier would take away the need to haul water

View source 1
01page 6View official source ↗
“Answer on Page 1 of SF1442. 22. What dates will water be on site through the water spicket, if there is running water it would make things much easier would take away the need to haul water.”
Source page 6

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 6
Requirement 2Verified
Answer - Page 3 of SF1442 POP dates. 24. Could a contractor use 3.5” pipe posts, they could be cut to fit a solid 2 7/8 top rail it would make the product stronger and look better? Bid as shown 25. If the gate Was adjusted to a 10’ gate it would create less work and be much easieRead full requirement Close full requirement

Answer - Page 3 of SF1442 POP dates. 24. Could a contractor use 3.5” pipe posts, they could be cut to fit a solid 2 7/8 top rail it would make the product stronger and look better? Bid as shown 25. If the gate Was adjusted to a 10’ gate it would create less work and be much easie

Applies when: If the gate Was adjusted to a 10’ gate it would create less work and be much easier to maintain and up keep on the corrals

View source 1
01page 6View official source ↗
“Answer - Page 3 of SF1442 POP dates. 24. Could a contractor use 3.5” pipe posts, they could be cut to fit a solid 2 7/8 top rail it would make the product stronger and look better? Bid as shown 25. If the gate Was adjusted to a 10’ gate it would create less work and be much easier to maintain and up”
Source page 6

Page markings may include other requirements. The quotation above identifies this requirement.

Source document page 6
Missing information8 checks · expand to review

A missing value is not a waiver. Check the source or ask the agency before relying on it.

Questions due

2 findings
Requirement 1Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Requirement 2Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

How to submit

2 findings
Requirement 1Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Requirement 2Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Required submission files

2 findings
Requirement 1Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Requirement 2Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

Acknowledge amendments

2 findings
Requirement 1Not found

—

Not found in reviewed sources

Requirement 2Not reviewed

—

Not reviewed — requirement not confirmed

6 additional fields have no reviewed finding.

Continue your review

6 more sections are available once you sign in

Pricing & payment · Bonds & insurance · Evaluation & award · Scope & delivery · Labor, sourcing & compliance · Contract terms & risk

Sign in — free

Extracted from the public documents linked above. This is an information aid, not a determination of bid eligibility or legal advice. Verify the original wording and any addenda before submitting a bid.

Bid review
6 days left
Official posting
Big Springs Horse Corral Replacement — AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF